From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higdon v. New York City Civ. Serv. Commn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1986
125 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Summary

In Higdon, the Civil Service Commission overruled the city's Department of Personnel and adopted the petitioner's interpretation of Civil Service Law § 80 (8) as conferring seniority for the purpose of determining eligibility for promotion. Nevertheless, the Commission rejected the petititoner's claim, on the ground that the seniority for constructive service as a firefighter could not be used to enhance petitioner's standing on the eligible list for captain because seniority credits for that post were only given for experience as a lieutenant.

Summary of this case from McKechnie v. Ortiz

Opinion

Decided December 23, 1986


JUDGMENT AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Higdon v. New York City Civ. Serv. Commn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1986
125 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

In Higdon, the Civil Service Commission overruled the city's Department of Personnel and adopted the petitioner's interpretation of Civil Service Law § 80 (8) as conferring seniority for the purpose of determining eligibility for promotion. Nevertheless, the Commission rejected the petititoner's claim, on the ground that the seniority for constructive service as a firefighter could not be used to enhance petitioner's standing on the eligible list for captain because seniority credits for that post were only given for experience as a lieutenant.

Summary of this case from McKechnie v. Ortiz
Case details for

Higdon v. New York City Civ. Serv. Commn

Case Details

Full title:HIGDON v. NEW YORK CITY CIV. SERV. COMMN

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

McKechnie v. Ortiz

The postenactment statements of a member of the Legislature, even one who sponsored the law in question, are…

McKechnie v. Ortiz

Moreover, the broad reading urged by plaintiffs to accommodate their asserted rights would necessarily…