From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higdon v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 2, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The appellant's time to provide the plaintiffs with the answer to item No. 2 of the plaintiffs' notice for discovery and inspection dated September 11, 1984, is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

By notice for discovery and inspection dated September 11, 1984, the plaintiffs requested, inter alia, the name and address of the physician, intern or resident, if any, present in the ambulance where the alleged malpractice took place. The plaintiffs had demanded this information previously, and the appellant had responded by providing the names and addresses of ambulance personnel only. A subsequent deposition of one of these individuals revealed the possibility that a physician was in the ambulance on the subject date, and the instant notice for discovery and inspection was served. In response thereto, the appellant wrote a letter stating, "[t]o date we are unable to document the name of the physician present".

The plaintiffs moved, inter alia, to preclude the appellant from claiming or offering any evidence with respect to this physician. In opposition, the appellant stated, "[a]lthough the name of the physician is not presently known to the County Attorney, this office is endeavoring to determine his or her identity. Upon positive identification that physician's name and last known address will be forwarded to all counsel."

Special Term granted the aforenoted branch of the plaintiffs' motion conditionally, giving the appellant an additional 20 days to comply with the notice.

Under the circumstances herein, it was not abuse of discretion for Special Term to conditionally grant preclusion. Although it cannot be said that the appellant's conduct amounted to a "willful failure" to comply, it has offered no explanation or justification for its failure to comply (see, Mountain Equities v. Insurance Co., 59 A.D.2d 670). The appellant is under an obligation to conduct its litigation in a forthright manner (see, Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447). In light of the considerable time which it has had to comply, it is appropriate that it provide this information within 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, or be precluded from offering such evidence. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Higdon v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Higdon v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE HIGDON et al., Respondents, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. New York City Housing Authority

The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in precluding the testimony of the plaintiff's notice witnesses.…

Bufogle v. Pesiri

The record shows that the plaintiff's initial failure to provide the requested tax records was not willful or…