Hiett v. State

6 Citing cases

  1. Morse v. State

    327 P.2d 707 (Okla. Crim. App. 1958)   Cited 1 times

    "Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed." Dodge v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124; Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. This court has gone further as to say in Barefield v. State, 26 Okla. Cr. 274, 223 P. 408:

  2. Freels v. State

    320 P.2d 731 (Okla. Crim. App. 1958)   Cited 3 times

    "Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed." Dodge v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124; Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. This court has gone further as to say in Barefield v. State, 26 Okla. Cr. 274, 223 P. 408:

  3. EDD v. STATE

    316 P.2d 875 (Okla. Crim. App. 1957)

    "Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed." Dodge v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124; Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. This court has gone further as to say in Barefield v. State, 26 Okla. Cr. 274, 223 P. 408:

  4. Hulsey v. State

    169 P.2d 771 (Okla. Crim. App. 1946)   Cited 25 times

    Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed and no argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed. Dodge v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124; Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. We have carefully reviewed the record.

  5. Rieckert v. State

    144 P.2d 117 (Okla. Crim. App. 1943)   Cited 1 times

    Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed. Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. An examination of this record discloses that defendant was positively identified as being the individual who struck the complaining witness over the head with a large bottle concealed in a paper sack, knocking the complainant down but not rendering him unconscious.

  6. Dodge v. State

    144 P.2d 124 (Okla. Crim. App. 1943)   Cited 6 times

    Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed. Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866. We have carefully examined the record.