From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hidalgo v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 20, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV722-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16CV722-HEH

10-20-2016

JORDAN HIDALGO, Plaintiff, v. OFC. BUNTING, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on September 19, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. On September 26, 2016, United States Postal Service returned the September 19, 2016 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "NOT HERE RETURN TO SENDER." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date:October 20, 2016
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Hidalgo v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 20, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV722-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Hidalgo v. Bunting

Case Details

Full title:JORDAN HIDALGO, Plaintiff, v. OFC. BUNTING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 20, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16CV722-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2016)