From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-00405-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-00405-MCE-CMK-P.

April 20, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On March 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 3, 2011, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

Dated: April 19, 2011


Summaries of

Hicks v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-00405-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Hicks v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. T. VIRGA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-00405-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Bobballa

Court records confirm that plaintiff has been designated a three strikes litigant. See Hicks v. Virga, No.…