From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. U.S. Postal Service, Office of Inspector General

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 30, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-360-Orl-22KRS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:06-cv-360-Orl-22KRS.

March 30, 2006


ORDER


This cause came on for consideration pursuant to a Motion to Quash Administrative Subpoenas and for Injunctive Relief (doc. no. 1) filed by Petitioners Hal D. Hicks and Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc. Upon reviewing the motion to quash, the Court has determined that the petitioners complied with subsections (a)(1) (2) of 12 U.S.C. § 3410. Hence, the Government authority, in this case the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, is hereby ORDERED to file a sworn response to the motion to quash as it pertains to Hal D. Hicks and Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc. on or before April 7, 2006, as provided by 12 U.S.C. § 3410(b).

It is further ORDERED that Suntrust Bank in Daytona Beach, FL, shall not produce documents pursuant to the subpoena with respect to open and closed accounts held in the name of Hal D. Hicks or Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc., pending further order of the Court. Counsel for the United States Postal Service shall promptly advise Suntrust Bank of the contents of this Order and provide it with a copy of this Order.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. U.S. Postal Service, Office of Inspector General

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 30, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-360-Orl-22KRS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Hicks v. U.S. Postal Service, Office of Inspector General

Case Details

Full title:HAL D. HICKS, ET AL., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, OFFICE…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:06-cv-360-Orl-22KRS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2006)