From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 3, 2015
594 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-7309

03-03-2015

CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02103-ELH) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1657 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-02103-ELH (D. Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Hicks v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 3, 2015
594 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Hicks v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 3, 2015

Citations

594 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015)