From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 7, 1930
26 S.W.2d 876 (Ark. 1930)

Opinion

Opinion delivered April 7, 1930.

CRIMINAL LAW — GROUND OF ARREST OF JUDGMENT. — A judgment in a criminal case will be arrested only on the ground that the facts alleged in the indictment did not constitute a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court.

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District; J. Sam Wood, Judge; affirmed.

Harney McGehee, for appellant.

Hal L. Norwood, Attorney General, for appellee.


Tom Hicks prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction for the crime of uttering a forged instrument. There is no bill of exceptions, and the sole reliance for a reversal of the judgment is that the court erred in overruling the defendants motion in arrest of judgment. Under our statute, a judgment can only be arrested on the ground that the facts alleged in the indictment did not constitute a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court. Dover v. State, 165 Ark. 496, 265 S.W. 76; and Lewis v. State, 169 Ark. 340, 275 S.W. 663.

The indictment contains the essential elements of the crime charged as defined in Ferrel v. State, 165 Ark. 541, 265 S.W. 62. There is no error upon the face of the record, and the judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 7, 1930
26 S.W.2d 876 (Ark. 1930)
Case details for

Hicks v. State

Case Details

Full title:HICKS v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 7, 1930

Citations

26 S.W.2d 876 (Ark. 1930)
181 Ark. 492

Citing Cases

Resort Funding, L.L.C. v. Canyonview Dev., L.P.

Based on our review of case law from other jurisdictions, the general rule appears to be that a receiver may…

In re American Bridge Products, Inc.

Not having done so, the receiver was guilty of negligence in the discharge of his duty and was liable to the…