From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 22, 1930
23 Ala. App. 507 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

7 Div. 595.

April 22, 1930.

Appeal from DeKalb County Court; E. M. Baker, Judge.

R. P. Hicks was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Reversed and rendered.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


The appellant was tried in the court below by the judge and without a jury; was adjudged guilty, and appealed to this court.

By express terms of the statute, the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of this state have appellate and supervisory jurisdiction of the court in which this case was tried, and the judge thereof. Local Acts 1927, p. 99, § 27, and where a case has been tried by the judge of the court without the intervention of a jury; on appeal, we are to review the same without any presumption in favor of the court below, either on the rulings on the law, or conclusion on the evidence, and, if there be error, shall render such judgment in the cause as the court below should have rendered, or reverse and remand the same for further proceedings in the court below as this court may deem right. Section 8599, Code 1923.

In conformity to the foregoing, we hold that the conviction of this appellant in the court below was erroneous, and that under the evidence adduced upon the trial the accused was entitled to his discharge.

The state failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, the only evidence tending to establish the corpus delicti was manifestly based upon the conclusions and opinions of the witnesses who testified in this connection, and conviction for crime cannot be rested upon such evidence. There is some analogy in this case with the case of Humphrey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 244, 77 So. 82. Section 4719 of the 1923 Code also has some bearing upon the manner in which a case of this character should be tried and determined.

Several of the exceptions reserved to the court's rulings were well taken. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and an order here entered that the appellant, defendant below, be discharged from further custody in this proceeding.

Reversed and rendered.


Summaries of

Hicks v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 22, 1930
23 Ala. App. 507 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Hicks v. State

Case Details

Full title:HICKS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 22, 1930

Citations

23 Ala. App. 507 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
128 So. 115

Citing Cases

Schwyhart v. United States

It leaves the proof of the corpus delicti entirely conjectural because it fails to show affirmatively a…

Northington v. State

It is not possible to ask for the affirmative charge in a case where there is no jury. Nor can a special…