From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

January, 1916.

Present — Clarke, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ.


The order appealed from should be modified by confining the examination to the issues raised by the denials in the answer, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.


Order affirmed as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Hicks v. Rosenbaum

Case Details

Full title:JOHN H. HICKS and Others, Respondents, v . WILLIAM ROSENBAUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1916

Citations

172 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)