From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Robertson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
1:21-cv-01276-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01276-SKO-HC

09-28-2021

FRANKIE LON HICKS, Petitioner, v. JIM ROBERTSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In the petition filed on August 23, 2021, Petitioner failed to name a respondent. Petitioner was granted leave to amend to name a proper respondent, and on September 24, 2021, Petitioner moved to amend the petition to name Jim Robertson, the warden of his institution, as Respondent in this matter. The state officer having custody of Petitioner is the proper respondent. Rule 2 (a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, Petitioner's motion to amend the petition to name Jim Robertson, Warden, as Respondent is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Robertson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
1:21-cv-01276-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Hicks v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE LON HICKS, Petitioner, v. JIM ROBERTSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01276-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)