From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Rembert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Nov 4, 2019
CASE NO. C19-5674 RJB (W.D. Wash. Nov. 4, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. C19-5674 RJB

11-04-2019

RONNIE LEE HICKS II, MATHEW GANT, and MATHEW RENGUUL, Plaintiffs, v. TERRY LEE REMBERT, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. Dkt. 17. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff Hick's objections (Dkt. 18) and the remaining file.

The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 17) should be adopted and pro se Plaintiff Hick's Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. 16) should be denied. Further, as recommended in the Report and Recommendation, pro se Plaintiffs Gant and Renguul should be dismissed from this case without prejudice. Plaintiff Hick's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 18) are without merit. They do not provide adequate grounds to not adopt the Report and Recommendation. The case should be re-referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Christel for further proceedings.

It is ORDERED that:

• The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 17) IS ADOPTED;

• The Plaintiff Hick's Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. 16) IS DENIED;

• Plaintiffs Gant and Renguul ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

• The case IS RE-REFERRED to U.S. Magistrate Judge Christel for further proceedings.

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to U.S. Magistrate Judge Christel, all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se at said party's last known address.

Dated this 4th day of November, 2019.

/s/_________

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hicks v. Rembert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Nov 4, 2019
CASE NO. C19-5674 RJB (W.D. Wash. Nov. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Hicks v. Rembert

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LEE HICKS II, MATHEW GANT, and MATHEW RENGUUL, Plaintiffs, v. TERRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Nov 4, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. C19-5674 RJB (W.D. Wash. Nov. 4, 2019)

Citing Cases

Stith v. State

See, e.g., Hegge v. Inslee, No. C20-6170-BJR-MLP, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32769, 2021 WL 673503 (W.D. Wash.…

Patterson v. Alstad

Many district courts in the Ninth Circuit have decided similarly. See, e.g., Hegge v. Inslee, No.…