Summary
holding "foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4, Fla. Const."
Summary of this case from Demayo v. ChamesOpinion
No. MM-162.
August 7, 1979.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Levy County, W.O. Beauchamp, J.
J. Michael Davis of the Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Gainesville, for appellants.
Bevin G. Ritch of Lowry Ritch, Gainesville, for appellee.
The lower tribunal rendered an order of foreclosure, holding that foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4(a), Fla. Const. We affirm. Hart v. Sanderson's Administrators, 18 Fla. 103 (1881).
MILLS, C.J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.