From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Maschari

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County
Feb 18, 1999
Court of Appeals No. E-99-011 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 18, 1999)

Opinion

No. E-99-011.

Decided: February 18, 1999.

Rodney A. Hicks, pro se.


OPINION


This court received a petition for mandamus filed by relator, Rodney A. Hicks, on February 2, 1999. 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 provides, in pertinent part: "An original action, other than habeas corpus, shall be instituted by the filing of an original and three copies of a complaint. The petitioner or relator shall also file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe." (Emphasis added). No praecipe was filed by relator. Accordingly, this court orders that the petition for mandamus is dismissed for failure to comply with 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6. Costs assessed to relator.

PETITION DISMISSED. Peter M. Handwork, P.J. James R. Sherck, J. Richard W. Knepper, J.

CONCUR.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Maschari

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County
Feb 18, 1999
Court of Appeals No. E-99-011 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 18, 1999)
Case details for

Hicks v. Maschari

Case Details

Full title:Rodney A. Hicks, Relator v. Judge; Ann B. Maschari of the Erie County…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County

Date published: Feb 18, 1999

Citations

Court of Appeals No. E-99-011 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 18, 1999)