From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 15, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1108 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1108 GEB EFB P.

December 15, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's December 7, 2009 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 15, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1108 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Hicks v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:RON HICKS, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1108 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2009)