From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 22, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0662 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0662 LKK KJM P.

May 22, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 4, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (Docket No. 3), are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Hicks v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 22, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0662 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Hicks v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:RON HICKS, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, Warden, et al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0662 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 22, 2008)