From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division
Jul 3, 2001
No. B139140 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2001)

Opinion


Page 529c

90 Cal.App.4th 529c ROBIN HICKS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KAUFMAN AND BROAD HOME CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents SYNTHETIC INDUSTRIES, INC., Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. B139140. California Court of Appeal, Second District, Seventh Division July 3, 2001

[Modification of opinion (89 Cal.App.4th 908 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 761) on denial of petition for rehearing.]

OPINION

THE COURT.

Before Johnson, Acting P. J., Woods, J., and Boland, J. [‡]

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 6, 2001, be modified as follows:

1. On page 5, following the quotation at lines 6-7 [89 Cal.App.4th 915, advance report, line 7], insert a new footnote numbered 10 (with all subsequent footnotes to be renumbered) and add the citation:

Block, supra, 65 Cal.App.4th at page 541.

2. On page 13, following the quotation at lines 1-3 [89 Cal.App.4th 920, advance report, 2d par., last line], insert a new footnote numbered 39 (with all subsequent footnotes to be renumbered) and add the citation:

Khan, supra, 217 Cal.App.4th at page 854, footnote omitted.

These modifications do not effect a change in the judgment.

The respondents' petition for rehearing is denied.

CONCURRING:

WOODS, J.—I agree with the modification but would grant the petition for rehearing.

*


Summaries of

Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division
Jul 3, 2001
No. B139140 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2001)
Case details for

Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN HICKS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KAUFMAN AND BROAD HOME…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division

Date published: Jul 3, 2001

Citations

No. B139140 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2001)