From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Gunter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
CV 112-164 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CV 112-164

02-08-2013

ABIGAIL G. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. LINDA GUNTER, HUMANA GOVERNMENT BUSINESS, INC. a/k/a HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., and HUMANA INC., Defendants.


ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act against Defendant Gunter are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED this 8thday of February, 2013, at Augusta, Georgia.

______________________________

HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Summaries of

Hicks v. Gunter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
CV 112-164 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Hicks v. Gunter

Case Details

Full title:ABIGAIL G. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. LINDA GUNTER, HUMANA GOVERNMENT BUSINESS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

CV 112-164 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dixon v. King & Prince Seafood Corp.

dividual capacity claims brought under the ADA. Mason v. Stallings, 82 F.3d 1007, 1009 (11th Cir. 1996)…