From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Goff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 1, 2019
Case No. 2:19-cv-556 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-556

11-01-2019

EMMETT D. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. LT. ELLIOT GOFF, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 21, 2019. (ECF No. 3.) The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Several weeks after the time had passed for the plaintiff to file an objection, he filed a motion for an extension of time, (ECF No. 4), but in it he does not say the reason for the extension, how long he wants, or what good cause might be to grant an extension. And, the plaintiff also filed an appeal with the Sixth Circuit, who denied it. (ECF No. 8.) Therefore, the Court DENIES the motion for extension of time (ECF No. 4) and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court DISMISSES this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 11-1-2019
DATE

/s/ _________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hicks v. Goff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 1, 2019
Case No. 2:19-cv-556 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Hicks v. Goff

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT D. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. LT. ELLIOT GOFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 1, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-556 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2019)

Citing Cases

Easley v. Zimmerman

Plaintiff has not provided any admissible evidence of injuries suffered, nor has he presented evidence of the…