From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Does

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2008
1:07-cv-00006 LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00006 LJO-DLB (PC).

February 12, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER (DOCUMENT #11) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 22, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to respond to the Court's order of December 3, 2007. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a response to the order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Does

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2008
1:07-cv-00006 LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Hicks v. Does

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1 thru 5, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-00006 LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)