Hicks v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Full title: STEVEN HICKS, Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 25, 2012

No.: 2:12-cv-00749-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No.: 2:12-cv-00749-KJD-RJJ

10-25-2012

STEVEN HICKS, Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC., Defendants.

Michael K. Brown (Pro Hac Vice) Marilyn Moberg (Pro Hac Vice) Mildred Segura (Pro Hac Vice) REED SMITH LLP Paul M. Haire, Esq. (NV Bar No. 5656) SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM Attorneys for C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.

KENT J. DAWSON

Michael K. Brown (Pro Hac Vice)
Marilyn Moberg (Pro Hac Vice)
Mildred Segura (Pro Hac Vice)
REED SMITH LLP
Paul M. Haire, Esq. (NV Bar No. 5656)
SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM
Attorneys for C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

The Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Davol Inc., is GRANTED.

For the convenience of the witnesses and parties, and in the interests of justice, the Northern Division of the District of Nevada is a more appropriate venue for this action. Plaintiff could have brought his case in the Northern Division, and the balance of factors point towards the Northern Division and away from the Southern Division of the District of Nevada as the appropriate venue.

______________________

HONORABLE KENT J. DAWSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE