From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Covello

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2021
Case No. 8:20-cv-00237-MCS (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 8:20-cv-00237-MCS (PD)

06-15-2021

DARYL A. HICKS, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003) ("A petitioner satisfies this standard [for certificate of appealability] by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate" to deserve encouragement to proceed further."). DATED: June 15, 2021

/s/_________

MARK C. SCARSI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hicks v. Covello

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2021
Case No. 8:20-cv-00237-MCS (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Hicks v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:DARYL A. HICKS, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

Case No. 8:20-cv-00237-MCS (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)