Opinion
No. 3094 Index No. 151405/23 Case No. 2023-04866
11-21-2024
Kenneth Hicks, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. City of Syracuse, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Corporation Counsel, City of Syracuse, Syracuse (Darienn P. Balin of counsel), for appellants. Smith Parry, P.L.L.C., Jordan (Jarrod W. Smith of counsel), for respondent.
Corporation Counsel, City of Syracuse, Syracuse (Darienn P. Balin of counsel), for appellants.
Smith Parry, P.L.L.C., Jordan (Jarrod W. Smith of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Webber, J.P., Singh, Gesmer, Pitt-Burke, Michael, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lisa S. Headley, J.), entered on or about August 25, 2023, which denied defendants' motion to change venue from New York County to Onondaga County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently denied defendants' motion to change venue based upon plaintiff's showing of compelling circumstances sufficient to override the mandate of CPLR 504(see CPLR 510[3]; Smith v City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2009]; Chitayat v Princeton Restoration Corp., 289 A.D.2d 102 [1st Dept 2001]). Plaintiff provided evidence that travel to Onondaga County would be a hardship for him and his witness, his treating psychiatrist, based on his limited financial means and the adverse effect it would have on his mental health.
We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.