From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Chamberlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 27, 1998
710 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

granting mandamus to compel the trial court to hold a hearing as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(d)

Summary of this case from Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

Case No. 98-0842

Opinion filed March 27, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Petition for writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, IV, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 97-17862 3592.

Donald Loughran, Coral Springs, for petitioner.

Susan R. Brown of Susan R. Brown, P.A., Hollywood, for respondent.


Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set a hearing on his motion to dissolve a temporary ex parte injunction. We grant the petition.

The petition recites petitioner's substantial efforts in the trial court throughout February to have a hearing set on his two applications for same before filing the present petition to seek relief.

The amended response does not dispute petitioner's entitlement to a hearing on his motion within five days of the application as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.610(d).

Accordingly, we direct the trial court to set a hearing date within five days of the issuance of this opinion. A rehearing will not be entertained.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Chamberlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 27, 1998
710 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

granting mandamus to compel the trial court to hold a hearing as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(d)

Summary of this case from Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case details for

Hicks v. Chamberlin

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HICKS, Petitioner, v. LYDIA CHAMBERLIN, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 27, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Tsiperfal v. Ohio Savings Securities

It should have been heard within five days of his seeking an immediate hearing. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(d);…

Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Petitioners argue that mandamus has been used to enforce other mandatory procedural rules. See Novartis…