Opinion
19-12716
11-22-2021
KIMBERLEY HICKS, Plaintiff, v. ADRIZA CAESAR, in her individual capacity, and BRIAN BROWN, in his individual capacity, Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAURIE J. MICHELSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Kimberley Hicks filed a complaint in September 2019, alleging that Brian Brown and Adriza Caesar discriminated against her based on race and sex in violation of state law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 8, PageID.62-66.)
Following discovery, Caesar alone filed for summary judgment. (ECF No. 27.) On October 27, 2021, the Court granted the motion for summary judgment on the § 1983 claim against Caesar, and it declined supplemental jurisdiction on the three state-law claims against both defendants. (ECF No. 33.) Only the § 1983 claim against Brown, which was the same claim that the Court dismissed against Caesar, survived.
On November 1, 2021, the Court entered the following text order: “the Court hereby gives notice of its intent to GRANT summary judgment to Defendant Brown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f)(1) on the remaining federal claim.” It invited Hicks to file a memorandum “setting forth new arguments as to why Brown was not entitled to such relief” by November 16, 2021.
Because Hicks failed to file a memorandum by the November 16 deadline, the Court GRANTS summary judgment to Brown on the § 1983 claim against him for the same reasons given in its previous opinion in this case. See (ECF No. 33); Hicks v. Caesar, No. 19-12716, 2021 WL 5040294 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 27, 2021). This case is dismissed.
SO ORDERED.