From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Cadle Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 23, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. May. 23, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-CBS.

May 23, 2007


ORDER


The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Entry And Certification Of Judgment Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) And Fed.R.Civ.P. 58. Having considered the parties' papers, the Court determines that certification of the Court's October 26, 2005, Order as a final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) is not appropriate at this time, particularly in light of the fact that the entire arbitration process appears recently to have been concluded. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Entry And Certification Of Judgment Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) And Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 (Doc. No. 133) is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion For Withdrawal Of Appearance is granted, and attorney Leah P. VanLandschoot is allowed to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. The Court notes that attorney Kris J. Kostolansky continues to represent Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Cadle Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 23, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. May. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Hicks v. Cadle Company

Case Details

Full title:KERRY R. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. May. 23, 2007)