From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Cadle Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 19, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-KLM.

September 19, 2007


ORDER


The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint And To Refer Claims To Arbitration (Doc. No. 187). Because Plaintiff is requesting leave to file new claims concerning events alleged to have occurred after the date of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff appears to be requesting leave to file a supplemental complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(d), not a second amended complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), which would supersede the prior Amended Complaint. The Court therefore treats Plaintiff's motion as a motion to file a supplemental complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(d) and refer claims to arbitration.

Before ruling on Plaintiff's motion, the Court requests that the attorneys hold a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix, who is new to this case. The attorneys thereafter shall advise the Court on or before October 10, 2007, of whether resolution of some or all of the issues presented by Plaintiff's motion, including the proposed supplemental claims themselves, is possible. If no resolution is possible, then the Court will proceed to rule on Plaintiff's motion.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Cadle Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 19, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Hicks v. Cadle Company

Case Details

Full title:KERRY R. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 19, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02616-ZLW-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2007)