From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Caddo Parish Animal Control

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-1548 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-1548

12-20-2012

DAVID L. HICKS, ET AL v. CADDO PARISH ANIMAL CONTROL, ET AL


JUDGE WALTER


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, no written objections having been filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 2) is denied. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 20th day of _______________, 2012.

_______________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hicks v. Caddo Parish Animal Control

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-1548 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Hicks v. Caddo Parish Animal Control

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. HICKS, ET AL v. CADDO PARISH ANIMAL CONTROL, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-1548 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)