From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Bradford

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 12, 2022
CV 21-7330-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-7330-DMG (GJSx)

09-12-2022

Darnell Hicks v. Floyd S. Bradford, III, et al.


Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

On August 3, 2022, the Court set a Scheduling Conference. [Doc. # 61.] As required by the Court's August 3, 2022 Order, Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. To date, a Joint Rule 26(f) Report has not been filed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties show cause in writing no later than September 16, 2022 why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. Failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution.

The scheduling conference on September 23, 2022 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Bradford

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 12, 2022
CV 21-7330-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Hicks v. Bradford

Case Details

Full title:Darnell Hicks v. Floyd S. Bradford, III, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 12, 2022

Citations

CV 21-7330-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2022)