Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank, FSB

4 Citing cases

  1. Williams v. DDR Media, LLC

    22-cv-03789-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)   Cited 3 times

    Defendants rely on Hicks|Park LLP v. ING Bank, FSB, No. CV 11-07330 ODW (AGRX), 2011 WL 5509097 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011), to argue that the labeling of the assent button is a “technicality” that should not defeat arbitration. In Hicks, a former client sued a law firm over a fee dispute, and the law firm signed a “Notice of Client's Right to Arbitration” and informed the client of its right to mandatory fee arbitration.

  2. Lake v. Hatanaka

    No. 2:18-cv-02013 JAM CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2018)

    Defendants have not waived the right to pursue arbitration under the MFAA, as plaintiff contended at the hearing. -------- In Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank, FSB, 2011 WL 5509097 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011), the district court granted defendants' motion to stay litigation relating to a fee dispute arising from a former attorney-client relationship. Similarly, in Naegele v. Albers, 355 F. Supp. 2d 129, 140 (D.D.C. Jan. 3, 2005), the district court stayed litigation involving "in part, a fee dispute arising out of an attorney-client relationship that originated in California between the plaintiff attorney and the defendant clients" pursuant to the MFAA.

  3. Lake v. Hatanaka

    No. 2:18-cv-02013 JAM CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2018)

    Defendants have not waived the right to pursue arbitration under the MFAA, as plaintiff contended at the hearing. -------- In Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank, FSB, 2011 WL 5509097 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011), the district court granted defendants' motion to stay litigation relating to a fee dispute arising from a former attorney-client relationship. Similarly, in Naegele v. Albers, 355 F. Supp. 2d 129, 140 (D.D.C. Jan. 3, 2005), the district court stayed litigation involving "in part, a fee dispute arising out of an attorney-client relationship that originated in California between the plaintiff attorney and the defendant clients" pursuant to the MFAA.

  4. Lake v. Hatanaka

    No. 2:18-cv-02013 JAM CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2018)

    Defendants have not waived the right to pursue arbitration under the MFAA, as plaintiff contended at the hearing. -------- In Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank, FSB, 2011 WL 5509097 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011), the district court granted defendants' motion to stay litigation relating to a fee dispute arising from a former attorney-client relationship. Similarly, in Naegele v. Albers, 355 F. Supp. 2d 129, 140 (D.D.C. Jan. 3, 2005), the district court stayed litigation involving "in part, a fee dispute arising out of an attorney-client relationship that originated in California between the plaintiff attorney and the defendant clients" pursuant to the MFAA.