From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickman v. U.S. Mint

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 2251 (D.D.C. Nov. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 2251.

November 10, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter comes before the court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff appears to demand compensation from the United States Mint, the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Tax Court and the Department of Justice for business losses he has suffered. As drafted, the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) as it includes no statement showing that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued on this same date.


Summaries of

Hickman v. U.S. Mint

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 2251 (D.D.C. Nov. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Hickman v. U.S. Mint

Case Details

Full title:DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MINT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 2251 (D.D.C. Nov. 10, 2009)