From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickman v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 3, 2023
1:20CR414-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:20CR414-1 1:23CV142

03-03-2023

GENE LEGRAND HICKMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Joe L. Webster, United States Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner, a federal prisoner convicted in this District, submitted a Letter in which he contends that the United States Bureau of Prisons is not in compliance with the Judgment in his criminal case based on its collection of monetary penalties. This is an attack on the execution of his sentence. Where a petitioner is attacking the execution and not imposition of a sentence, his petition is properly before the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See, e.g., Youngworth v. United States Parole Commission, 728 F.Supp. 384, 388 (W.D. N.C. 1990). Therefore, the Court construed Plaintiff s filing as being such a Petition. Further, in a § 2241 action, the petition should be filed in the district court of the district where the petitioner is in custody. Id. (citing Braden v, 30th Judicial Circuit, 410 U.S. 484, 495-500 (1973)). Accordingly, this Petition cannot be further processed because it appears that Petitioner is incarcerated in the District of New Jersey. Titis particular Petition should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition in the proper district after exhausting any available administrative remedies within the Bureau of Prisons. Petitioner should seek the proper forms from the Clerk of that district and file the new petition there. The address for the Clerk in the New Jersey is: Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Room 2020, Trenton, N.J. 08608.

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation of dismissal with permission to file a new petition in the proper district.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed sua sfonte without prejudice to Petitioner filing in the proper district after exhausting any available administrative remedies.


Summaries of

Hickman v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 3, 2023
1:20CR414-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Hickman v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GENE LEGRAND HICKMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 3, 2023

Citations

1:20CR414-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2023)