Hickman v. Davis

Full title: Anna HICKMAN, Respondent/Cross Appellant, v. Terry DAVIS, Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

655 S.W.3d 650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110281

12-06-2022

Anna HICKMAN, Respondent/Cross Appellant, v. Terry DAVIS, Appellant.

FOR APPELLANT: Scott C. Ehlermann, 655 Craig Road, Suite 252, St. Louis, MO 63141, Marie D. Lipowicz, 14368 Manchester Road, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63011. FOR RESPONDENT: Byron Cohen, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 320, Clayton, MO 63105.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Scott C. Ehlermann, 655 Craig Road, Suite 252, St. Louis, MO 63141, Marie D. Lipowicz, 14368 Manchester Road, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63011.

FOR RESPONDENT: Byron Cohen, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 320, Clayton, MO 63105.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., John P. Torbitzky, J., and Cristian M. Stevens, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Terry Davis appeals from the circuit court's judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the Family Support Division's decision regarding modification of a child support order. Anna Hickman cross-appeals. Hickman is the aggrieved party pursuant to Rule 84.05(e). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the circuit court did not commit reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).