From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickman v. Archives

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 10 0012 (D.D.C. Dec. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10 0012.

December 29, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff demands "payment of any royalty payments for use of copyrights, trademarks, [and] patents," an amount which "could exceed [$] 1 billion." Compl. at 1. As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) because it fails to include a short and plain statement showing that plaintiff is entitled to relief. For this reason, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff has filed at least ten complaints this year, all of which have been dismissed in screening because either the complaint is clearly frivolous and based on delusions or does not meet the minimum standards required as set forth in Rule 8. The plaintiff is advised that if he persists in filing such complaints, this Court may restrict his ability to proceed in forma pauperis.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.


Summaries of

Hickman v. Archives

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 10 0012 (D.D.C. Dec. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Hickman v. Archives

Case Details

Full title:Derian Douglas Hickman, Plaintiff, v. Derian Douglas Hickman Archives, et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 10 0012 (D.D.C. Dec. 29, 2009)