From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jun 5, 2012
367 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96935.

2012-06-5

Pietro Frank HICKEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Nancy L. Schneider, Judge. Gwenda Reneé Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Nancy L. Schneider, Judge.
Gwenda Reneé Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Movant, Pietro Frank Hickey, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on remand. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hickey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jun 5, 2012
367 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hickey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Pietro Frank HICKEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Jun 5, 2012

Citations

367 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)