From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickey v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

November, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Schenectady County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The action is brought by the plaintiff to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant, due to a defective pavement. A verified claim was prepared by the plaintiff and copies thereof were served upon the proper city officials and a copy was also served upon the corporation counsel. The appellant urges that the claim thus served on the corporation counsel was not the notice of intention to sue required to be served upon the corporation counsel by section 244 Second Class Cities of the Second Class Cities Law and furthermore that service upon the officials of the city of copies of the verified claim did not constitute service of a verified claim upon such officials. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Hickey v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Hickey v. City of Schenectady

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HICKEY, Respondent, v. CITY OF SCHENECTADY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)