From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hibbeler v. Sweeney

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 14, 1992
830 S.W.2d 490 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 60496.

April 14, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; JAMES R. HARTENBACH, JUDGE.

Ted Frank Frapolli, Lee Allison Bonine, Mertz, Stern Frapolli, St. Louis, for petitioner, appellant.

Allan F. Stewart, Braun, Stewart Anderson, Inc., Clayton, for respondent, respondent.


ORDER


This is an appeal from the trial court's order sustaining respondent's motion to dismiss on the grounds of a prior pending action in a court of concurrent jurisdiction. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hibbeler v. Sweeney

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 14, 1992
830 S.W.2d 490 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Hibbeler v. Sweeney

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA L. HIBBELER, PETITIONER/APPELLANT, v. JOHN T. SWEENEY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 14, 1992

Citations

830 S.W.2d 490 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)