From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hibbard v. Shaad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 27, 1984
99 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 27, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Lynch, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant's motion to vacate an order which granted summary judgment to plaintiff on the issue of liability only. It is conceded that service by mail of plaintiff's motion papers seeking summary judgment did not comply with the time requirements of CPLR 2214 (subd [b]) and 2103 (subd [b], par 2) (see Irish Propane Corp. v Burnwell Gas Distrs., 25 A.D.2d 616). Summary judgment may not be granted against a defendant who fails to appear in response to a motion on which he did not receive the minimum notice required by statute ( Morabito v Champion Swimming Pool Corp., 18 A.D.2d 706, 707). Plaintiff remains free, of course, to again seek summary relief upon proper notice.


Summaries of

Hibbard v. Shaad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 27, 1984
99 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Hibbard v. Shaad

Case Details

Full title:GLENDA C. HIBBARD, Respondent, v. ROBERT B. SHAAD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

State Bank v. Kaanam, LLC

In light of our determination in appeal No. 1, we dismiss as moot the appeal from the order in appeal No. 2.…

Golden v. Golden

Hence, this error deprived the court of jurisdiction to entertain the motion and rendered the resulting order…