Opinion
No. A135901.
02-08-2013
In re the Marriage of HOWARD L. HIBBARD and LYDIA H. HIBBARD.HOWARD L. HIBBARD, Appellant, v. LYDIA H. HIBBARD, Respondent.
[Modification of opinion (212 Cal.App.4th 1298; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]
THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on January 18, 2013, be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:
On page 13 [212 Cal.App.4th 1310, advance report, 2d par.], immediately following the last sentence of the second paragraph of the Disposition, and as part of that paragraph, the following language is added:
As a new rule of law, our determination will apply prospectively. (See, e.g., Harbor v. Deukmejian (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1078, 1101-1102 [240 Cal.Rptr. 569, 742 P.2d 1290].)
There is no change in the judgment.
The petition for rehearing filed by real party in interest Legislature of the State of California is denied.