From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hiatt v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 1, 1972
455 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-2512. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

February 1, 1972.

Edward T. M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dorothy T. Beasley, W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Deputy Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; William A. Bootle, Chief Judge.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.



On the basis of our decision in Smith v. Smith, 5th Cir. 1971, 454 F.2d 572, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Hiatt v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 1, 1972
455 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Hiatt v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PAUL HIATT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DOYAL SMITH, WARDEN, PUTNAM…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 1, 1972

Citations

455 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Scheridan v. Scheridan

2. In cases of latent ambiguity in a will, parol evidence of the language or declarations of the testator is…

McCray v. Caves

See Maxwell v. Hoppie, 70 Ga. 152, 161. 3. Under Code § 85-712 and the rulings in Snider v. Newsom, 24 Ga.…