From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hi-Tech, Inc. v. Rising

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jul 11, 2006
3:05cv265 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 11, 2006)

Opinion

3:05cv265.

July 11, 2006


ORDER


On December 5, 2005, the magistrate judge issued a Memorandum and Recommendation in the present case recommending that the defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Count" be denied as moot. (Doc. No. 38.) The parties were advised that objections were to be filed in writing within ten days after service of the magistrate judge's decision. The deadline for filing objections has since passed, and neither party has filed objections in this matter. After a careful review of the Memorandum and Recommendation, the Court finds that the magistrate judge's proposed findings of fact are supported by the record and that the proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the magistrate judge's recommendations.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Count is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Hi-Tech, Inc. v. Rising

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jul 11, 2006
3:05cv265 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Hi-Tech, Inc. v. Rising

Case Details

Full title:HI-TECH, INC. Plaintiff, v. LARRY E. RISING, individually and d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jul 11, 2006

Citations

3:05cv265 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 11, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wooten v. Lincoln Nursing Center

"A pleading that has been amended . . . supersedes the pleading it modifies. . . . Once an amended pleading…

Wooten v. Infinity Partners, LLC

[I]t is well settled that a timely-filed amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that motions…