Opinion
2:16-cv-02148-GMN-VCF
01-04-2022
H&H PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. CHATTEM CHEMICALS, INC., a foreign corporation; SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, INC., a foreign corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
Joseph A. Gutierrez, Esq. Danielle J. Barraza, Esq. Maier Gutierrez & Associates Attorneys for Plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC KAEMPFER CROWELL ROBERT MCCOY, ESQ. Cicely I. Lubben, Esq. Admitted Pro Hace Vice TUCKER ELLIS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc.
Joseph A. Gutierrez, Esq.
Danielle J. Barraza, Esq.
Maier Gutierrez & Associates
Attorneys for Plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC
KAEMPFER CROWELL
ROBERT MCCOY, ESQ.
Cicely I. Lubben, Esq.
Admitted Pro Hace Vice
TUCKER ELLIS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc.
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 89]
(Second Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, the law firm Maier Gutierrez & Associates, and defendants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, the law firms of Kaempfer Crowell and Tucker Ellis LLP, that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 89] filed on November 23, 2021, shall be continued from January 4, 2022, to and including January 11, 2022. Defendants shall have up to and including February 1, 2022 to file any reply to Plaintiff's response. 1
The requested extension is necessary to allow Plaintiff sufficient time to review and appropriately respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, and to allow Defendants sufficient time to prepare a reply brief, in light of holiday schedules which created staffing issues, and commitments which have required this additional time. This is the parties' second request for an extension and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2