Opinion
2:23-cv-00748-GMN-DJA
08-17-2023
BROWNSTEIN HYATT, FARBER SCHRECK, LLP, FRANK M. FLANSBURG III, ESQ., MAXIMILIEN D. FETAZ, ESQ., EMILY L. DYER, ESQ., ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, AARON F. MINER, ESQ. (pro hac vice), SASHA ZHENG, ESQ. (pro hac vice), ANDREW C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (pro hac vice), KELLEY CHANGFONG-HAGEN, ESQ. (pro hac vice), AIDAN MULRY, ESQ. (pro hac vice), Attorneys for Plaintiff HF Foods Group, Inc. SKLAR WILLIAMS PLLC, STEPHEN R. HACKETT, ESQ., Attorney for Defendants Zhou Min Ni; Fai Lam, in his capacity as Trustee of The Irrevocable Trust for Raymond Ni; Weihui Kwok; Yuanyuan Wu and Maodong Xu
BROWNSTEIN HYATT, FARBER SCHRECK, LLP, FRANK M. FLANSBURG III, ESQ., MAXIMILIEN D. FETAZ, ESQ., EMILY L. DYER, ESQ., ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, AARON F. MINER, ESQ. (pro hac vice), SASHA ZHENG, ESQ. (pro hac vice), ANDREW C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (pro hac vice), KELLEY CHANGFONG-HAGEN, ESQ. (pro hac vice), AIDAN MULRY, ESQ. (pro hac vice), Attorneys for Plaintiff HF Foods Group, Inc.
SKLAR WILLIAMS PLLC, STEPHEN R. HACKETT, ESQ., Attorney for Defendants Zhou Min Ni; Fai Lam, in his capacity as Trustee of The Irrevocable Trust for Raymond Ni; Weihui Kwok; Yuanyuan Wu and Maodong Xu
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT YUANYUAN WU TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff HF Foods Group Inc. (“Plaintiff”), through its counsel of record Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP and Defendant Yuanyuan Wu (“Ms. Wu”), through her counsel of record, Sklar Williams PLLC, as follows:
1. On May 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Damages and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief for Violations of Federal Securities Laws against Defendants. ECF 2.
2. On or about May 17, 2023, Plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint on Ms. Wu. ECF 42.
3. On June 5, 2023, Defendants Fai Lam, in his capacity as Trustee of The Irrevocable Trust for Raymond Ni (“Mr. Lam”), Weihui Kwok (“Mr. Kwok”), and Ms. Wu moved for a 30-day extension to respond to the Complaint, which the Court granted. ECF 44-45.
4. Thereafter, the Parties expressed a mutual desire to engage in good faith settlement discussions.
5. As with certain other Defendants, Ms. Wu changed counsel and retained counsel, necessitating additional time to respond to the Complaint, which Plaintiff has accommodated.
6. On August 15, 2023, Defendants Zhou Min Ni (“Mr. Ni”), Maodong Xu (“Mr. Xu”), Mr. Lam, and Mr. Kwok stipulated to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint by approximately 60 days in order to further the Parties' settlement discussions and to coordinate Defendants' response deadline should the Parties not settle.
7. Thereafter, Ms. Wu retained counsel.
8. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a), the Parties wish to extend the deadline for Ms. Wu to respond to the Complaint by approximately 60 days in order to further the Parties' settlement discussions and to coordinate all Defendants' response deadline should the Parties not settle.
9. No discovery deadlines or dates for trial have been set.
10. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and agree that Ms. Wu shall have up to and including October 10, 2023 within which to file her responses to Plaintiff's Complaint.
11. This stipulation is brought in good faith by the parties and not for purposes of delay.
12. This is the Parties' second request to extend Ms. Wu's response deadline.
Plaintiff and Mr. Lam, Mr. Kwok, and Ms. Wu filed a stipulation to extend the deadline to answer the Complaint on June 14, 2023 (ECF 47), which was denied without prejudice for failing to state the reason for the requested extension under LR IA 6-1(a). ECF 48.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.