From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heymann v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It cannot be said that the verdict was not based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence which presented a sharp issue of fact. It was within the province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses, and to refuse to credit the testimony of plaintiffs ( see, Taype v. City of New York, 82 A.D.2d 648, 650-651, lv denied 55 N.Y.2d 608; cf. Lorenzo v Lubchansky, 75 A.D.2d 865).

We have considered plaintiffs' other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Thompson, Bracken, and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heymann v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Heymann v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:PAULA HEYMANN et al., Appellants, v. SHIRLEY MORRISON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)