From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hey v. Town Board of Potter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 21, 1986
117 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 21, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The April 1982 vote of the Town Board was not sufficient to repeal the zoning ordinance. Town Law § 265 requires a three-fourths vote of the Town Board in order to repeal a zoning ordinance after protest has been registered, as it was here, by 20% of the affected property owners. Since the Board consists of five members, it was necessary to have four favorable votes in order to repeal the ordinance and thus the 3 to 1 vote, with one member abstaining, was insufficient for repeal. Thus viewed there is no need to address the other issues raised.


Summaries of

Hey v. Town Board of Potter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 21, 1986
117 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Hey v. Town Board of Potter

Case Details

Full title:WILBUR HEY et al., Appellants, v. TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF POTTER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Van Patten v. La Porta

This protest triggered the three-fourths majority voting requirement. We therefore find that Supreme Court…