From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewkin v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 12, 2012
Civ. No. 6:10-cv-01434-TC (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6:10-cv-01434-TC

07-12-2012

DARLENE ROSE HEWKIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on May 24, 2012. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff timely filed objections (doc. 31), which were considered by this court. I have given the file of this case a de novo review. In conclusion, I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 29) that the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence and that plaintiff is not entitled to benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hewkin v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 12, 2012
Civ. No. 6:10-cv-01434-TC (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Hewkin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE ROSE HEWKIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 6:10-cv-01434-TC (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2012)