Opinion
Civ. No. 6:10-cv-01434-TC
07-12-2012
ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on May 24, 2012. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff timely filed objections (doc. 31), which were considered by this court. I have given the file of this case a de novo review. In conclusion, I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 29) that the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence and that plaintiff is not entitled to benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge