From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewitt v. Silent Automatic Sales Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February, 1933.


Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversing judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle and granting judgment for plaintiff, and judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle entered thereon, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered in the City Court of New Rochelle, costs to abide the event. On the trial the general authority of O'Hare, the branch manager, to make a contract of this nature was established. The admission of defendant's Exhibit 1 in evidence was erroneous and constituted prejudicial error. The question of fact to be determined on the new trial is whether or not the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for commissions. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hewitt v. Silent Automatic Sales Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Hewitt v. Silent Automatic Sales Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. HEWITT, Respondent, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)