From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewitt v. Renn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1955
286 App. Div. 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

November 16, 1955.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Memorandum: In this action to recover real estate commissions, it affirmatively appears that the exclusive listing contract entered into between the defendant owner and the plaintiff real estate broker had expired and that thereafter plaintiff, acting as agent for one interested in purchasing defendant's property, submitted a purchase offer to defendant. The offer was never accepted by the owner. Under such circumstances, plaintiff is not entitled to recover payment of a commission. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie County Court for plaintiff in an action for real estate commissions. The order denied a motion for a new trial.)


Summaries of

Hewitt v. Renn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1955
286 App. Div. 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Hewitt v. Renn

Case Details

Full title:REUBEN B. HEWITT, Doing Business as HEWITT REALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1955

Citations

286 App. Div. 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Donald Zucker Company v. Prime Properties, Inc.

Consequently, we must agree with defendants that once the brokerage agreement had expired by its terms, there…