HETTLER v. DODY

Full title: RICHARD J. HETTLER, Plaintiff, v. LYDIA DODY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 9, 2007

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00781-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00781-WDM-MJW.

March 9, 2007

ORDER

WALKER MILLER, District Judge

This matter is before me on a letter from the plaintiff submitted to the Clerk on an ex parte basis. Such an ex parte communication with me would violate the spirit if not the letter of our local rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 77.2. Plaintiff's letter expressly disclaims it is a motion and will not be interpreted as such.

Because of some confusion as to the nature of the plaintiff's filing, it was initially sealed without a motion to seal being filed in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2

Upon review of the file and being sufficiently advised, it is ordered:

1. Plaintiff's March 4, 2007 letters to me and the Clerk of this court shall be unsealed.

2. Plaintiff's March 4, 2007 letter is stricken as an improper attempt at ex parte communication.