From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hettinger v. Cooke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01363-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01363-WYD-CBS

09-28-2011

DENISE HETTINGER f/k/a DENISE SEYBOLD, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. COOKE, individually and in his official capacity as Weld County Sheriff, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of the file. On September 8, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. This motion was filed in reference to the original complaint. On September 27, 2011, a First Amended Complaint was filed by Plaintiff. This was properly filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) without leave of Court, even though a motion to dismiss, is pending since no responsive pleading has been served. Calderon v. Kansas Dep't of Social And Rehabilitation Servs., 181 F.3d 1180, 1185 (10th Cir. 1999); Glenn v. First Nat'l Bank, 868 F.2d 368, 370 (10th Cir. 1989).

The First Amended Complaint substantially expands the allegations and appears to add and/or delete claims from the original complaint. Accordingly, I find that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss relating to the original complaint (ECF No. 18) should be DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant may, if he wishes, file a new motion to dismiss that addresses the allegations and claims of the First Amended Complaint. In such motion, Defendant may refer the Court back to the original motion to dismiss as to arguments made therein that are still viable.


Summaries of

Hettinger v. Cooke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01363-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Hettinger v. Cooke

Case Details

Full title:DENISE HETTINGER f/k/a DENISE SEYBOLD, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. COOKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01363-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)